On 08/23/2016 09:48 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/24, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>
>> 2827 if (drv_type < 0)
>> 2828 return drv_type;
>> 2829
>> 2830 drv_vdd = get_drv_vdd(drvdata, i);
>> 2831 if (drv_vdd < 0)
>> 2832 return drv_vdd;
>> 2833
>> 2834 drv_trim = get_drv_trim(drvdata, i);
>> 2835 if (drv_trim < 0)
>> 2836 return drv_trim;
>> 2837
>> 2838 drv_invert = get_drv_invert(drvdata, i);
>> 2839 if (drv_invert < 0)
>> 2840 return drv_invert;
>> 2841
>> 2842 for (j = 0; drv_configs[j].description; j++) {
>>> 2843 if (drv_configs[j].fmt == drv_type &&
>> 2844 drv_configs[j].vdd == drv_vdd &&
>> 2845 drv_configs[j].trim == drv_trim &&
>> 2846 (drv_invert | (drv_configs[j].invert >> 2))
>> ==
>> 2847 ((drv_configs[j].invert & 3) |
>> 2848 (drv_configs[j].invert>>2)))
>
> It might be better to write it as a set of continues instead so
> that it isn't one complicated conditional
>
> config = &drv_configs[j];
> if (config->fmt != drv_type)
> continue;
> if (config->vdd != drv_vdd)
> continue;
> ...
> seq_puts()
> match = 1;
> break;
>
Stephen,
Thanks for the suggestion. I will send an update.
York
