(Please trim replies)
On 08/24, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> Looks like the whole of my series was rejected,
> but I was not sure why the following one was rejected.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9236563/
>
Replying to that patch would have been better.
>
> Could you explain why -EPROBE_DEFER should be returned
> if both .get_hw and .get are missing.
That's just a bug. Perhaps this patch would be better, and look,
it saves 5 lines.
---8<----
drivers/clk/clk.c | 17 ++++++-----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 71cc56712666..d3d26148cdfb 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -3174,19 +3174,14 @@ __of_clk_get_hw_from_provider(struct of_clk_provider
*provider,
struct of_phandle_args *clkspec)
{
struct clk *clk;
- struct clk_hw *hw = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
- if (provider->get_hw) {
- hw = provider->get_hw(clkspec, provider->data);
- } else if (provider->get) {
- clk = provider->get(clkspec, provider->data);
- if (!IS_ERR(clk))
- hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
- else
- hw = ERR_CAST(clk);
- }
+ if (provider->get_hw)
+ return provider->get_hw(clkspec, provider->data);
- return hw;
+ clk = provider->get(clkspec, provider->data);
+ if (IS_ERR(clk))
+ return ERR_CAST(clk);
+ return __clk_get_hw(clk);
}
struct clk *__of_clk_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
>
>
> Is there a way to register an OF clk provider without .get(_hw),
> but fill it later or something?
>
No.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
