On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masah...@socionext.com> wrote:
> Many of clk_disable() implementations just return for NULL pointer,
> but this check is missing from some. Let's make it tree-wide
> consistent. It will allow clock consumers to call clk_disable()
> without NULL pointer check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <g...@uclinux.org>
> Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos....@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
