On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> wrote: > Many of clk_disable() implementations just return for NULL pointer, > but this check is missing from some. Let's make it tree-wide > consistent. It will allow clock consumers to call clk_disable() > without NULL pointer check. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> > Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <g...@uclinux.org> > Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos....@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds