On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:43:16 +0100
Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <zubair.kakak...@imgtec.com> wrote:
> The MIPS based xilfpga platform has the following IRQ structure
>
> Peripherals --> xilinx_intcontroller -> mips_cpu_int controller
>
> Add support for the driver to chain the irq handler
>
> Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <zubair.kakak...@imgtec.com>
>
> ---
> V1 -> V2
>
> No change
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-axi-intc.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-axi-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-axi-intc.c
> index 90bec7d..a0be6fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-axi-intc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-axi-intc.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/bug.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>
> static void __iomem *intc_baseaddr;
>
> @@ -135,11 +136,26 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops xintc_irq_domain_ops
> = {
> .map = xintc_map,
> };
>
> +static void xil_intc_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + u32 pending = get_irq();
> +
> + if (pending != -1U) {
> + while (true) {
> + pending = get_irq();
> + generic_handle_irq(pending);
> + if (pending == -1U)
Erm... So even when pending is -1, you're calling generic_handle_irq?
This doesn't seem right.
You're also missing the chained_irq_enter/exit calls around this loop.
Overall, this should be rewritten in a less cumbersome way. Something
like:
do {
u32 pending;
pending = get_irq();
if (pending == ~0)
break;
generic_handle_irq(pending);
} while (true);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int __init xilinx_intc_of_init(struct device_node *intc,
> struct device_node *parent)
> {
> u32 nr_irq, intr_mask;
> - int ret;
> + int ret, irq;
> + struct device_node *parent_node;
>
> intc_baseaddr = of_iomap(intc, 0);
> BUG_ON(!intc_baseaddr);
> @@ -188,6 +204,16 @@ static int __init xilinx_intc_of_init(struct device_node
> *intc,
> root_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(intc, nr_irq, &xintc_irq_domain_ops,
> (void *)intr_mask);
>
> + parent_node = of_irq_find_parent(intc);
You already have the parent node as an argument to the function. Why do
you need to do that again?
> + if (parent_node) {
> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(intc, 0);
> + if (irq)
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq,
> + xil_intc_irq_handler,
> + root_domain);
> +
> + }
> +
> irq_set_default_host(root_domain);
>
> return 0;
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
