On Sun, 2016-08-28 at 11:28 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > I do think that there is some value in doing similar things in a uniform > way, using meaningful names, even if in a particular case it doesn't help > performance or reduce code size. Even duplicating code could be OK if it > is not in a critical path and it makes the code overall easier to > understand. But if the maintainer prefers the code not to be duplicated, > then of course it should not be duplicated.
All true too, thanks Julia. It's all maintainer choice.
