On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 03:16:52PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Aug 27, 2016, at 12:22 AM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: > > Ben, Mathieu, Dave, do you have jemalloc benchmark numbers with and > > without rseq? (As well as memory usage numbers for the reduced memory > > usage of per-CPU pools rather than per-thread pools?) > > Before I started reimplementing rseq, the numbers presented by Facebook > at https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/22/588 were in my opinion a good proof > that rseq is useful. I'm not sure if their memoryidler API was used back > then. > > I could take Dave's jemalloc branch adapted to Paul Turner's rseq and > adapt it to mine. Then we could use this allocator to compare the > memory use and speed of heavily multi-threaded applications. > > Thoughts ?
That seems like it would provide a good concrete benchmark of this work, and demonstrate the value of it.
