complexmode_enter() contains an smp_rmb() after spin_unlock_wait().
This was done to allow safe backporting.
With commit 2c6100227116
("locking/qspinlock: Fix spin_unlock_wait() some more"),
(and the commits for the other archs), spin_unlock_wait() is an
ACQUIRE.
Therefore the smp_rmb() after spin_unlock_wait() can be removed.
Not for stable!
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manf...@colorfullife.com>
---
ipc/sem.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 5e318c5..6586e0a 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -290,14 +290,6 @@ static void complexmode_enter(struct sem_array *sma)
sem = sma->sem_base + i;
spin_unlock_wait(&sem->lock);
}
- /*
- * spin_unlock_wait() is not a memory barriers, it is only a
- * control barrier. The code must pair with spin_unlock(&sem->lock),
- * thus just the control barrier is insufficient.
- *
- * smp_rmb() is sufficient, as writes cannot pass the control barrier.
- */
- smp_rmb();
}
/*
--
2.7.4
