On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:17:50PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > Agreed. I don't have a box to test, so I can't take on this driver. But > leaving > it in tree for a while longer doesn't hurt (much ... it seems to get a > tree-wide > cleanup patch about once a year ... which doesn't sound like a crushing > overhead).
Here it is: --- From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:55:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] EDAC, I3000: Orphan driver Apparently there's no hw left at Intel for testing patches and Jason is not going to maintain it anymore. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> --- CREDITS | 4 ++++ MAINTAINERS | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/CREDITS b/CREDITS index 2a3fbcd229e6..1d7c43f3361f 100644 --- a/CREDITS +++ b/CREDITS @@ -3654,6 +3654,10 @@ S: Obere Heerbergstrasse 17 S: 97078 Wuerzburg S: Germany +N: Jason Uhlenkott +E: [email protected] +D: I3000 EDAC driver + N: Greg Ungerer E: [email protected] D: uClinux kernel hacker diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 20bb1d00098c..13c6abeb451a 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -4454,9 +4454,8 @@ S: Maintained F: drivers/edac/i82443bxgx_edac.c EDAC-I3000 -M: Jason Uhlenkott <[email protected]> L: [email protected] -S: Maintained +S: Orphan F: drivers/edac/i3000_edac.c EDAC-I5000 -- 2.8.4 -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --
