On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:06:43PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Yes, I considered this option, but to me the addtional finish_wait() > looks simpler.
its all relative, this stuff always makes my head hurt one way or the other ;-) > And, if you agree with this change I will try to change __wait_event() > as well and kill abort_exclusive_wait(). Yeah, I think this'll work. Please send a new series with 'enhanced' changelog so that when we have to look at this again in a few weeks/months time we won't be cursing at ourselves for how the heck it was supposed to work.
