On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:11:46PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 06:25:47PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > The static key API is currently designed around single variable > > definitions. There are cases where an array of static keys is desirable, > > so extend the API to allow this rather than using the internal static > > key implementation directly. > > > > Suggested-by: Dave P Martin <[email protected]> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > > Cc: Jason Baron <[email protected]> > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> > > --- > > Documentation/static-keys.txt | 9 +++++++++ > > include/linux/jump_label.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > > This looks pretty straightforward to me, and I'd like to take it via > the arm64 tree given that your subsequent patch depends on it. > > Peter -- are you ok with this?
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
