On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Dou Liyang wrote: > This is a code optimization. >
Not sure that it's optimization, it's just for correctness. > If checking the topology package map of apicid and cpu is failure, > it will stop generating the processor info for that apicid and the > disabled_cpus will plus one. However, the num-processors has already > been added one above. That may cause the number of processors incorrect. > > Just put the num_processors++ code in the more suitable position. > it makes sure that the num-processors will not conflict with the > disabled_cpus. > > Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
