Hi Marcelo Thanks for the suggestion
Will consider that B.R. Jia On 9/6/16 8:44 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:30:03AM +0800, Jia He wrote: ...v2: - 1/6 fix bug in udplite statistics. - 1/6 snmp_seq_show is split into 2 parts Jia He (6): proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show proc: Reduce cache miss in snmp6_seq_show proc: Reduce cache miss in sctp_snmp_seq_show proc: Reduce cache miss in xfrm_statistics_seq_show ipv6: Remove useless parameter in __snmp6_fill_statsdev net: Suppress the "Comparison to NULL could be written" warningHi Jia, Did you try to come up with a generic interface for this, like snmp_fold_fields64() (note the fieldS) or snmp_fold_field64_batch() ? Sounds like we have the same code in several places and seems they all operate very similarly. They have a percpu table, an identified max, a destination buffer.. If this is possible, this would reduce the possibility of hiccups in a particular code. Marcelo
