On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 11:24 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> The chip_type variable in struct pca953x_chip is no longer required.
> 
> Remove it.

Would it be patch 4 in the series?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> index 6b62898..00bb2ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ struct pca953x_chip {
>       struct i2c_client *client;
>       struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
>       const char *const *names;
> -     int     chip_type;
>       unsigned long driver_data;
>  
>       const struct pca953x_offset *offset;
> @@ -760,8 +759,6 @@ static int pca953x_probe(struct i2c_client
> *client,
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     chip->chip_type = PCA_CHIP_TYPE(chip->driver_data);
> -
>       mutex_init(&chip->i2c_lock);
>  
>       /* initialize cached registers from their original values.
> @@ -774,7 +771,7 @@ static int pca953x_probe(struct i2c_client
> *client,
>       else if (chip->gpio_chip.ngpio >= 24)
>               chip->write_regs = pca953x_write_regs_24;
>  
> -     if (chip->chip_type == PCA953X_TYPE)
> +     if (PCA_CHIP_TYPE(chip->driver_data) == PCA953X_TYPE)
>               ret = device_pca953x_init(chip, invert);
>       else
>               ret = device_pca957x_init(chip, invert);

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Intel Finland Oy

Reply via email to