On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/06/2016 10:19 PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> Now that track_pfn_insert() is no longer used in the DAX path, it no >> longer needs to comprehend pfn_t values. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]> >> --- >> arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 4 ++-- >> include/asm-generic/pgtable.h | 4 ++-- >> mm/memory.c | 2 +- >> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > A small nit. Should not the arch/x86/mm/pat.c changes be separated out > into a different patch ? Kind of faced little bit problem separating out > generic core mm changes to that of arch specific mm changes when going > through the commits in retrospect.
I'm going to drop this change. Leaving it as is does no harm, and users of pfn_t are likely to grow over time.
