On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:19:24PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > Also given many other syscalls take clockids and the backing logic > isn't really getting removed (probably could cut the dynamic posix > clocks core with the same conditional), I wonder if you could get a > similar size win by taking a slightly more narrow cutting of the > subsystem. That way you could preserve the more useful clock_gettime() > functionality, but maybe stub out some of the less often used > functionality.
I want to support tinification, but I also doubt the utility of removing clock_gettime() and clock_nanosleep(). I can't imagine ever building a user space without those. In fact, thinking about IoT, having good time is critical, and so these are the *last* functions I would remove when downsizing. Thanks, Richard