On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner <da...@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA is only detectable via the
>> >> vma_is_dax() helper to check the S_DAX inode flag. However, this is
>> >> only available internal to the kernel and is a property that userspace
>> >> applications would like to interrogate.
>> >
>> > They have absolutely no business knowing such an implementation detail.
>>
>> Hasn't that train already left the station with FS_XFLAG_DAX?
>
> No, that's an admin flag, not a runtime hint for applications. Just
> because that flag is set on an inode, it does not mean that DAX is
> actually in use - it will be ignored if the backing dev is not dax
> capable.
Ok, but then VM_DAX does not suffer from that problem. I'm trying to
understand why VM_DAX has no business being in the smaps "VmFlags"
line, but something ambiguous to userspace like VM_MIXEDMAP does?
>
>> The other problem with hiding the DAX property is that it turns out to
>> not be a transparent acceleration feature. See xfs/086 xfs/088
>> xfs/089 xfs/091 which fail with DAX and, as far as I understand, it is
>> due to the fact that DAX disallows delayed allocation behavior.
>
> Which is not a bug, nor is it something that app developers should
> be surprised by.
>
> i.e. Subtle differences in error reporting behaviour occur in
> filesystems /all the time/. Run the test on a non-dax filesystem
> with an extent size hint. It fails /exactly the same way as DAX/.
> Run it with direct IO - fails the same way as DAX. Run it
> with synchronous writes - it fails the same way as DAX.
>
> IOWs, if an app can't handle the way DAX reports errors, then they
> are /broken/. Delayed allocation requires checking the return value
> of fsync() or close() to capture the allocation error - many more
> apps get that wrong than the ones that expect the immediate errors
> from write()...
>
> Anyway: to domeonstrate that the nothign is actually broken, and
> you might sometimes need to fix tests and send patches to
> fste...@vger.kernel.org, this makes xfs/086 pass for me on DAX:
>
> --- a/tests/xfs/086
> +++ b/tests/xfs/086
> @@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ _scratch_mount
>
> echo "+ modify files"
> for x in `seq 1 64`; do
> - $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x62 0 ${blksz}" "${TESTFILE}.${x}" >>
> $seqres.full
> + $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x62 0 ${blksz}" "${TESTFILE}.${x}" \
> + >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> done
> umount "${SCRATCH_MNT}"
Thanks for that! Wasn't immediately obvious to me, and didn't get
that response when I asked on the list a while back.
