On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > > Boris Brezillon (2): > > genirq: Provide irq_gc_{lock_irqsave,unlock_irqrestore}() helpers > > This seems somewhat questionable. > > The non-irqsafe versions of these functions have specialized non-SMP > versions for them. The new ones don't. > > I pulled it, because I think it's actually the old versions that are > garbage (the locking should become a no-op on UP regardless - except > for the preemption issue which I don't see why it wouldn't be real), > but I think this is inconsistent and should be fixed (or a comment > added about why it is ok).
Yes, it lacks a comment. The reason why the non save versions are empty is that these primitives are solely used in the irq chip hotpath functions. UP folks wanted to avoid the preempt disable/enable in these anyway interrupt disabled contexts. Thanks, tglx