On 09/19/2016 02:11 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 09/18/2016 11:02 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> > If you plan to handle openrisc going forward, it would be great if you >
could
> consider updating MAINTAINERS. The web site and git repository have been >
unreachable
> for a long time.
Thank you,
Updating maintainers was kind of on my plans, but I figured I need to
prove that I kind of know what I am doing.
The alternative would be to mark it as Orphaned. Which, for all practical
purpose,
would be the correct state right now.
+CC The openrisc list
Understood, I don't think we would want that to happen.
Look at the entry today:
OPENRISC ARCHITECTURE
M: Jonas Bonn <[email protected]>
W: http://openrisc.net
S: Maintained
T: git git://openrisc.net/~jonas/linux
F: arch/openrisc/
At the very least, W: and T: are incorrect and need to be updated or removed.
Plus, apparently there is a L:, and "T: https://github.com/openrisc/linux";
might be appropriate.
Guenter
