Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI)

[Martin Dalecki]

Alexander Viro wrote:
> 
> On 9 Nov 2000, Mike Coleman wrote:
> 
> > Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > <shrug> RMS had repeatedly demonstrated what he's worth as a designer
> > > and programmer. Way below zero. You may like or dislike his ideology,
> > > but when it comes to technical stuff... Not funny.
> >
> > Huh?
> >
> > <annoying valspeak tone>
> >
> > *Hello*?  GNU gcc?  GNU emacs?  Way below zero?  *Hello*?!?
> >
> > </annoying valspeak tone>
> 
> Yes. GNU emacs. Bloated and ugly like hell. gcc. Codebase is anything but
> pretty. Your point being? And no, it's not trolling. RMS really got no
> taste - read his postings on _technical_ GNU lists and see yourself.

Actually emacs is complete crap int terms of both ergonomy and coding.
But the current gcc code base doesn't contain much from RMS anylonger. 
The "beauty" of lisp coded in C it is...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/