> The problem with the hooks et.al. is very simple - they promote every
> bloody implementation detail to exposed API. ....

Surely not, having the kernel source does that. The alternative to the hook
is embed a patch in the kernel source.  What proveds greater exposure to
internals: hooks of source?


Richard Moore -  RAS Project Lead - Linux Technology Centre (PISC).

http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux
Office: (+44) (0)1962-817072, Mobile: (+44) (0)7768-298183
IBM UK Ltd,  MP135 Galileo Centre, Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN, UK


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to