3.4.112-rt144-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>

There should be no need to hold the base lock during the wakeup. There
should be no boosting involved, the wakeup list has its own lock so it
should be safe to do this without the lock.

Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/timer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index 4954adeff38c..d94b2c463d9b 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -1235,8 +1235,8 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct tvec_base *base)
                        spin_lock_irq(&base->lock);
                }
        }
-       wakeup_timer_waiters(base);
        spin_unlock_irq(&base->lock);
+       wakeup_timer_waiters(base);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
-- 
2.8.1


Reply via email to