On 25/09/16 15:44, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> This is a more worthwhile change in my mind to the jump label changes. > > Thanks for another bit of positive feedback for this refactoring. > > >> Would you mind resending with it not based on top of those? > > Is a resend really needed? It's a question of time. Maintainers regularly push back stuff they could fix up themselves purely to save their time.
Also, I'm afraid I don't care enough to put the time in for this one. I care enough to review / apply the patch though. > > Does the tool "Git" let you also apply this update step before > the other suggestions? It rarely copes with this sort of reordering as it doesn't have the semantic knowledge of what matters in the other patches. > > Would you dare a reordering of items according to your change preferences? > > Regards, > Markus >
