On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:47:37AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:41 -0500 > Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Greg KH wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release. > > > > > > This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so > > > if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree, > > > please let me know. > > > > > > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to > > > this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let > > > us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants > > > to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. > > > > > > > What is the status of: > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-handle-irqs-pending-in-irr-during-irq-migration.patch > > That's mainly an Andi decision. Let's cc him.
I didn't think the problem was serious enough for a backport. Do we have user reports? It's certainly not trivial obvious patches. Eric, what is your opinion? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/