On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > Can this be rephrased to: "Returns true if preemption has been > disabled and a call to rt_mutex_postunlock() is required (which will > re-enable preemption)"
I agree with Steven that the comments should be rephrased.
Thanks,
tglx
