From: Anshuman Khandual <khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes the following build failure -
cp_abort.c:90:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only
allowed in C99 or C11 mode
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
^
cp_abort.c:90:3: note: use option -std=c99, -std=gnu99, -std=c11 or
-std=gnu11 to compile your code
cp_abort.c:97:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only
allowed in C99 or C11 mode
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <wei.guo.si...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyril...@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c
index 5a5b55a..1ce7dce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ int test_cp_abort(void)
/* 128 bytes for a full cache line */
char buf[128] __cacheline_aligned;
cpu_set_t cpuset;
- int fd1[2], fd2[2], pid;
+ int fd1[2], fd2[2], pid, i;
char c;
/* only run this test on a P9 or later */
@@ -87,14 +87,14 @@ int test_cp_abort(void)
FAIL_IF(pid < 0);
if (!pid) {
- for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
FAIL_IF((write(fd1[WRITE_FD], &c, 1)) != 1);
FAIL_IF((read(fd2[READ_FD], &c, 1)) != 1);
/* A paste succeeds if CR0 EQ bit is set */
FAIL_IF(paste(buf) & 0x20000000);
}
} else {
- for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
FAIL_IF((read(fd1[READ_FD], &c, 1)) != 1);
copy(buf);
FAIL_IF((write(fd2[WRITE_FD], &c, 1) != 1));
--
1.8.3.1
