On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 16:26 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Oct 1, 2016 1:49 PM, <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > From: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com> > > > > Move all handling of the next state FPU state handling into > > switch_fpu_finish, in preparation for more lazily switching > > FPU states. > > > > CR0.TS state is mirrored in a per-cpu variable, instead of > > being passed around in a local variable, because that will > > not be possible later in the series. > > This seems reasonable in principle, but IMO it would be less scary if > you rebased onto this: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/log/?h=x8 > 6/fpu
I can rebase on top of that. I am perfectly fine with your patches going in first, and mine later on. Too many FPU changes at once is risky, anyway. -- All Rights Reversed.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
