4.7-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Omar Sandoval <[email protected]>

commit 52b9c330c6a8a4b5a1819bdaddf4ec76ab571e81 upstream.

If ->queue_rq() returns BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK, we use continue and skip
over the rest of the loop body. However, dptr is assigned later in the
loop body, and the BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK case is exactly the case that we'd
want it for.

NVMe isn't actually using BLK_MQ_F_DEFER_ISSUE yet, nor is any other
in-tree driver, but if the code's going to be there, it might as well
work.

Fixes: 74c450521dd8 ("blk-mq: add a 'list' parameter to ->queue_rq()")
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 block/blk-mq.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct
                switch (ret) {
                case BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK:
                        queued++;
-                       continue;
+                       break;
                case BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY:
                        list_add(&rq->queuelist, &rq_list);
                        __blk_mq_requeue_request(rq);


Reply via email to