From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:41:09 +0200

The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 82d79f5..554b6d2 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1502,7 +1502,7 @@ static void raid10_status(struct seq_file *seq, struct 
mddev *mddev)
                seq_printf(seq, "%s", rdev && test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) ? 
"U" : "_");
        }
        rcu_read_unlock();
-       seq_printf(seq, "]");
+       seq_puts(seq, "]");
 }
 
 /* check if there are enough drives for
-- 
2.10.1

Reply via email to