On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 03:01:01PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > From: Peter Huewe <peterhu...@gmx.de> > > In some weird cases it might be possible that the TPM does not set > STS.VALID within the given timeout time (or ever) but sets STS.EXPECT > (STS=0x0C) In this case the driver gets stuck in the while loop of > tpm_tis_send_data and loops endlessly.
Doesn't that exchange mean the TPM has lost synchronization with the driver? Or maybe it crashed executing a command or something.. Please indicate what hardware is broken like this.. Or how did you get it to do this? Jason
