I'm puzzled.
$ git bisect start fc_bsg master
Bisecting: 8 revisions left to test after this (roughly 3 steps)
[005d51510eee6102636d5dbb06310531c5d46151] scsi: fc: implement kref
backed reference counting
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 3 revisions left to test after this (roughly 2 steps)
[bef6da201de1bb81bb4d9511f9a155862efc251f] scsi: Unify interfaces of
fc_bsg_jobdone and bsg_job_done
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 1 revision left to test after this (roughly 1 step)
[3087864ce3d7282f59021245d8a5f83ef1caef18] scsi: don't use
fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps)
[81aea44720d22d2e0c4a2613ae8b1c256ef6b0cb] scsi: Get rid of struct
fc_bsg_buffer
$ git bisect good
3087864ce3d7282f59021245d8a5f83ef1caef18 is the first bad commit
commit 3087864ce3d7282f59021245d8a5f83ef1caef18
Author: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
Date: Wed Oct 12 15:06:28 2016 +0200
scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly
Don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly, but use
helper variables bsg_request and bsg_reply. This will be helpfull when
transitioning to bsg-lib.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
:040000 040000 140c4b6829d5cfaec4079716e0795f63f8bc3bd2
0d9fe225615679550be91fbd9f84c09ab1e280fc M drivers
From there (on the reverse bisect path) I get the following Oops,
except for the full patch set having another stack trace as in my
previous mail (dying in zfcp code).
[ 46.942452] Oops: 0004 ilc:2 [#1] [ 46.942460] PREEMPT SMP [ 46.942465]
[ 46.942470] Modules linked in: nf_log_ipv6 xt_pkttype nf_log_ipv4
nf_log_common xt_LOG xt_limit ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 xt_tcpudp
nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_raw ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4
iptable_raw xt_CT iptable_filter ip6table_mangle nf_conntrack_netbios_ns
nf_conntrack_broadcast nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_tables xt_conntrack
nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables qeth_l2 ghash_s390 prng ecb
aes_s390 des_s390 des_generic sha512_s390 sha256_s390 sha1_s390 sha_common
dm_mod qeth ccwgroup zfcp qdio autofs4
[ 46.942547] CPU: 1 PID: 1714 Comm: zfcp_ping Not tainted 4.8.0fcbsg+ #9
[ 46.942550] Hardware name: IBM 2964 N96 702
(z/VM)
[ 46.942556] task: 000000005c988008 task.stack: 000000005d2ec000
[ 46.942560] Krnl PSW : 0704e00180000000 00000000007c91ec[ 46.942574]
(fc_bsg_request_handler+0x404/0x4b0)
[ 46.942579]
[ 46.942583] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:2 PM:000:
[ 46.942598] RI:0 EA:3
[ 46.942601]
[ 46.942601] Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffcb 0000000000000000
0000000080000001
[ 46.942603] 00000000007c8fe8 0000000064398c68 0000000069f967e8
000000006a3d8008
[ 46.942605] 000000006a5e02c8 00000000698b5490 0000000000000000
0000000000000000
[ 46.942607] 000000006a9ef5f8 0000000000a36840 00000000007c8fe8
000000005d2efa00
[ 46.942619] Krnl Code: 00000000007c91de: e55dc08c0003 clfhsi
140(%r12),3[ 46.942622]
[ 46.942622] 00000000007c91e4: a7240004 brc 2,7c91ec
#00000000007c91e8: a7f40001 brc
15,7c91ea[ 46.942629]
[ 46.942629] >00000000007c91ec: 5010b000 st
%r1,0(%r11)
00000000007c91f0: e54cb0040000 mvhi
4(%r11),0[ 46.942635]
[ 46.942635] 00000000007c91f6: e54cc08c0004 mvhi
140(%r12),4
00000000007c91fc: b904002c lgr
%r2,%r12[ 46.942643]
[ 46.942643] 00000000007c9200: c0e5ffffe2c0 brasl
%r14,7c5780
[ 46.942646]
[ 46.942647] Call Trace:
[ 46.942650] ([<00000000007c8fe8>] fc_bsg_request_handler+0x200/0x4b0)
[ 46.942656] ([<00000000006b8e0a>] __blk_run_queue+0x52/0x68)
[ 46.942661] ([<00000000006c549a>] blk_execute_rq_nowait+0xf2/0x110)
[ 46.942664] ([<00000000006c557a>] blk_execute_rq+0xa2/0x110)
[ 46.942668] ([<00000000006de0ee>] bsg_ioctl+0x1f6/0x268)
[ 46.942675] ([<000000000036ca20>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x680/0x6d8)
[ 46.942677] ([<000000000036caf4>] SyS_ioctl+0x7c/0xb0)
[ 46.942685] ([<00000000009a541e>] system_call+0xd6/0x270)
[ 46.942687] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 46.942688] Last Breaking-Event-Address:
[ 46.942692] [<00000000007c91e4>] fc_bsg_request_handler+0x3fc/0x4b0
[ 46.942696] [ 46.942698] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception:
panic_on_oops
On 10/12/2016 03:06 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
Don't use fc_bsg_job::request and fc_bsg_job::reply directly, but use
helper variables bsg_request and bsg_reply. This will be helpfull when
transitioning to bsg-lib.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c | 9 +-
drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad_bsg.c | 40 +++---
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 22 ++--
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c | 23 ++--
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c | 194 +++++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_bsg.c | 264 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c | 5 +-
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_isr.c | 46 ++++---
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mr.c | 10 +-
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c | 37 +++---
10 files changed, 387 insertions(+), 263 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
index 8ff2067..eafc7555 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
@@ -3588,9 +3588,10 @@ fc_bsg_jobdone(struct fc_bsg_job *job)
{
struct request *req = job->req;
struct request *rsp = req->next_rq;
+ struct fc_bsg_reply *bsg_reply = job->reply;
int err;
- err = job->req->errors = job->reply->result;
+ err = job->req->errors = bsg_reply->result;
if (err < 0)
/* we're only returning the result field in the reply */
@@ -3602,10 +3603,10 @@ fc_bsg_jobdone(struct fc_bsg_job *job)
req->resid_len = 0;
if (rsp) {
- WARN_ON(job->reply->reply_payload_rcv_len > rsp->resid_len);
+ WARN_ON(bsg_reply->reply_payload_rcv_len > rsp->resid_len);
/* set reply (bidi) residual */
- rsp->resid_len -= min(job->reply->reply_payload_rcv_len,
+ rsp->resid_len -= min(bsg_reply->reply_payload_rcv_len,
rsp->resid_len);
}
blk_complete_request(req);
@@ -3701,6 +3702,8 @@ fc_req_to_bsgjob(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct fc_rport
*rport,
struct fc_internal *i = to_fc_internal(shost->transportt);
struct request *rsp = req->next_rq;
struct fc_bsg_job *job;
+ struct fc_bsg_request *bsg_request;
+ struct fc_bsg_reply *bsg_reply;
int ret;
BUG_ON(req->special);
@@ -3726,9 +3729,9 @@ fc_req_to_bsgjob(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct fc_rport
*rport,
if (i->f->dd_bsg_size)
job->dd_data = (void *)&job[1];
spin_lock_init(&job->job_lock);
- job->request = (struct fc_bsg_request *)req->cmd;
+ bsg_request = (struct fc_bsg_request *)req->cmd;
job->request_len = req->cmd_len;
- job->reply = req->sense;
+ bsg_reply = req->sense;
job->reply_len = SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE; /* Size of sense buffer
* allocated */
if (req->bio) {
@@ -3779,11 +3782,13 @@ fc_bsg_host_dispatch(struct request_queue *q, struct
Scsi_Host *shost,
struct fc_bsg_job *job)
{
struct fc_internal *i = to_fc_internal(shost->transportt);
+ struct fc_bsg_request *bsg_request = job->request;
+ struct fc_bsg_reply *bsg_reply = job->reply;
int cmdlen = sizeof(uint32_t); /* start with length of msgcode */
int ret;
/* Validate the host command */
- switch (job->request->msgcode) {
+ switch (bsg_request->msgcode) {
case FC_BSG_HST_ADD_RPORT:
cmdlen += sizeof(struct fc_bsg_host_add_rport);
break;
@@ -3815,7 +3820,7 @@ fc_bsg_host_dispatch(struct request_queue *q, struct
Scsi_Host *shost,
case FC_BSG_HST_VENDOR:
cmdlen += sizeof(struct fc_bsg_host_vendor);
if ((shost->hostt->vendor_id == 0L) ||
- (job->request->rqst_data.h_vendor.vendor_id !=
+ (bsg_request->rqst_data.h_vendor.vendor_id !=
shost->hostt->vendor_id)) {
ret = -ESRCH;
goto fail_host_msg;
@@ -3840,8 +3845,8 @@ fc_bsg_host_dispatch(struct request_queue *q, struct
Scsi_Host *shost,
fail_host_msg:
/* return the errno failure code as the only status */
BUG_ON(job->reply_len < sizeof(uint32_t));
- job->reply->reply_payload_rcv_len = 0;
- job->reply->result = ret;
+ bsg_reply->reply_payload_rcv_len = 0;
+ bsg_reply->result = ret;
job->reply_len = sizeof(uint32_t);
fc_bsg_jobdone(job);
return FC_DISPATCH_UNLOCKED;
@@ -3878,11 +3883,13 @@ fc_bsg_rport_dispatch(struct request_queue *q, struct
Scsi_Host *shost,
struct fc_rport *rport, struct fc_bsg_job *job)
{
struct fc_internal *i = to_fc_internal(shost->transportt);
+ struct fc_bsg_request *bsg_request = job->request;
+ struct fc_bsg_reply *bsg_reply = job->reply;
int cmdlen = sizeof(uint32_t); /* start with length of msgcode */
int ret;
/* Validate the rport command */
- switch (job->request->msgcode) {
+ switch (bsg_request->msgcode) {
case FC_BSG_RPT_ELS:
cmdlen += sizeof(struct fc_bsg_rport_els);
goto check_bidi;
@@ -3915,8 +3922,8 @@ check_bidi:
fail_rport_msg:
/* return the errno failure code as the only status */
BUG_ON(job->reply_len < sizeof(uint32_t));
- job->reply->reply_payload_rcv_len = 0;
- job->reply->result = ret;
+ bsg_reply->reply_payload_rcv_len = 0;
+ bsg_reply->result = ret;
job->reply_len = sizeof(uint32_t);
fc_bsg_jobdone(job);
return FC_DISPATCH_UNLOCKED;
@@ -3937,6 +3944,7 @@ fc_bsg_request_handler(struct request_queue *q, struct
Scsi_Host *shost,
struct request *req;
struct fc_bsg_job *job;
enum fc_dispatch_result ret;
+ struct fc_bsg_reply *bsg_reply;
if (!get_device(dev))
return;
@@ -3973,8 +3981,9 @@ fc_bsg_request_handler(struct request_queue *q, struct
Scsi_Host *shost,
/* check if we have the msgcode value at least */
if (job->request_len < sizeof(uint32_t)) {
BUG_ON(job->reply_len < sizeof(uint32_t));
- job->reply->reply_payload_rcv_len = 0;
- job->reply->result = -ENOMSG;
+ bsg_reply = job->reply;
+ bsg_reply->reply_payload_rcv_len = 0;
+ bsg_reply->result = -ENOMSG;
job->reply_len = sizeof(uint32_t);
fc_bsg_jobdone(job);
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Steffen Maier
Linux on z Systems Development
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
