H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> By author: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > >
> > > Sensibly configured power saving/speed throttle systems do not change the
> > > frequency at all. The duty cycle is changed and this controls the cpu
> > > performance but the tsc is constant
> >
> > Do you have an example of notebook that does powersaving like that?
> > I have 2 examples of notebooks with changing TSC speed...
> >
>
> Intel PIIX-based systems will do duty-cycle throttling, for example.
What's this "duty cycle throtteling"? Some people seem to think this
refers to changing the duty cycle on the clock, and thereby saving
power. I think it doesn't save any power if you do it that way. You
are referring to the duty cycle on a "stpclk" signal, right?
Roger.
> However, there are definitely notebooks that will mess with the
> frequency. At Transmeta, we went through some considerable pain to
> make sure RDTSC would count walltime even across Longrun transitions.
--
** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* Common sense is the collection of *
****** prejudices acquired by age eighteen. -- Albert Einstein ********
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
