>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c >> index d3f151cfd4a1..8507703dabe4 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c >> @@ -544,6 +544,7 @@ acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface(struct >> acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *processor) >> return; >> } >> bootcpu_valid = true; >> + early_map_cpu_to_node(0, acpi_numa_get_nid(0, hwid)); >> return; >> } >> > > Anyway, your patch works with both the two-node NUMA configuration Drew > suggested for testing, and with the single-node config that I originally used > for the bisection. Therefore: > > Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > > Thank you very much for the quick bugfix! And, I think your patch (when you > send it for real) should carry I'm so sorry about this. My patch series prepared before ACPI NUMA upstreamed, and forgot considering it in later.
> > Fixes: 7ba5f605f3a0d9495aad539eeb8346d726dfc183 > > too, because it supplies the cpu#0<->node#xxx association that 7ba5f605f3a0 > removed not just for DT, but also for ACPI. > > Cheers! > Laszlo > > . >
