On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:45:32PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I wonder whether this is the proper abstraction level. We might as well do
> > the following:
> > 
> > rdtresources[] = {
> >      {
> >     .name   = "L3",
> >      },
> >      {
> >     .name   = "L3Data",
> >      },
> >      {
> >     .name   = "L3Code",
> >      },
> > 
> > and enable either L3 or L3Data+L3Code. Not sure if that makes things
> > simpler, but it's definitely worth a thought or two.
> 
> This way will be better than having cdp_enabled/capable for L3 and not
> for L2.

So you need to change the struct to have capable and enabled

> > static void rdt_get_config(int idx, struct rdt_resource *r)
> > {
> >     union cpuid_0x10_1_eax eax;
> >     union cpuid_0x10_1_edx edx;
> >     u32 ebx, ecx;
> > 
> >     cpuid_count(0x00000010, idx, &eax.full, &ebx, &ecx, &edx.full);
> >     r->max_closid = edx.split.cos_max + 1;
> >     r->num_closid = r->max_closid;
> >     r->cbm_len = eax.split.cbm_len + 1;
> >     r->max_cbm = BIT_MASK(eax.split.cbm_len + 1) - 1;
> >     r->enabled = true;

And set 

        r->capable = true; 

here instead of r->enabled and set r->enabled at mount time for the
resources depending on the mount flags.

Thanks,

        tglx


        


Reply via email to