Hello, On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:54:37AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > Also, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE deserves consideration (34 uses in capable() > > checks). I'd say, since cgroups are about resources, so there's > > something of a match there., so it's also worth considering. > > I'll try to look into CAP_SYS_RESOURCE. > > Colin/Todd: Any objection from the Android side on CAP_SYS_RESOURCE? > > (Or we could just create a new 512bit CAP2_ capabilities interface! :P)
FWIW, if CAP_SYS_RESOURCE works, I'd be happy with that. Thanks. -- tejun
