Hi Stephen

On 10/19/2016 10:32 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 10/14, [email protected] wrote:
@@ -532,10 +618,42 @@ static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device 
*dev, const char *name,
        { 0 },
  };
+struct stm32f4_clk_data {
+       const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gates_data;
+       const u64 *gates_map;
+       int gates_num;
+};
@@ -549,6 +667,19 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
                goto fail;
        }
+ match = of_match_node(stm32f4_of_match, np);
+       if (WARN_ON(!match))
+               return;
+
+       data = match->data;
+
+       clks = kmalloc_array(data->gates_num + END_PRIMARY_CLK,
+                       sizeof(struct clk_hw *), GFP_KERNEL);
sizeof(*clks)?
ok


+       if (!clks)
+               goto fail;
+
+       stm32f4_gate_map = data->gates_map;
+
        hse_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
clk_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy(NULL, "hsi", NULL, 0,
@@ -581,11 +712,15 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node 
*np)
        clks[FCLK] = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "fclk", "ahb_div",
                                               0, 1, 1);
- for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f4_gates); n++) {
-               const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gd = &stm32f4_gates[n];
-               unsigned int secondary =
-                   8 * (gd->offset - STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR) + gd->bit_idx;
-               int idx = stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(0, secondary);
+       for (n = 0; n < data->gates_num; n++) {
+               const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gd;
+               unsigned int secondary;
+               int idx;
+
+               gd = (struct stm32f4_gate_data *) &data->gates_data[n];
Why do we cast here? Get rid of const? Perhaps the struct
shouldn't have const on the member instead?
we don't need cast here.

Thank's Stephen

BR
Gabriel

+               secondary = 8 * (gd->offset - STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR) +
+                       gd->bit_idx;
+               idx = stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(0, secondary);
if (idx < 0)

Reply via email to