On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 02:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
>
[...]
> + if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) {
> + /*
> + * NOHZ_FULL CPUs need this as the governor callback
> may not
> + * be invoked on them.
> + */
> + intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
> + intel_pstate_max_within_limits(cpu);
> + }
> +
Can we move this to intel_pstate_set_performance_limits
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index a6ffd79..d0fd73e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -1543,6 +1543,13 @@ static void
intel_pstate_set_performance_limits(struct perf_limits *limits)
limits->max_sysfs_pct = 100;
limits->min_policy_pct = 0;
limits->min_sysfs_pct = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * NOHZ_FULL CPUs need this as the governor callback may not
+ * be invoked on them.
+ */
+ intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
+ intel_pstate_max_within_limits(cpu);
}
static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
@@ -1599,15 +1606,6 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct
cpufreq_policy *policy)
limits->max_perf = round_up(limits->max_perf, FRAC_BITS);
out:
- if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) {
- /*
- * NOHZ_FULL CPUs need this as the governor callback
may not
- * be invoked on them.
- */
- intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
- intel_pstate_max_within_limits(cpu);
- }
-
intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
intel_pstate_hwp_set_policy(policy);
Thanks,
Srinivas
