On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:55:45 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I know. This is under discussion with the driver folks as we are not going
> > to blindly export stuff just because someone slapped a irq_set_parent()
> > into the code w/o knowing why.
>
> Do we have any idea if a resolution is close. This was first reported
> in linux-next in September 14/15. :-(
Grr. Yes. As much as I hate it, I'll go and export it for now. Should be
able to get it into rc2.
Thanks,
tglx
