Since practically 90% of the code is shared between master and slave, I was thinking if it will be acceptable to use the same driver for both but differentiate the master/slave mode by the compatible strings.
Thanks, Luis On 10/18/2016 16:17, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> This is needed because the configuration is different and the i2c-designware >> cannot be master/slave without a reset. To resolve that I added this property >> to bind it as a slave when needed. > Aww, pity that the HW can't do that. Do you have details why? > > If that is really a HW limitation, then I'd suggest having a seperate > driver for slave-only mode so we can differentiate by compatible > strings. >