On 10/21/2016 04:23 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:17:48PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 130654 off 0 csum 2566472073 expected csum 3008371513 > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131057 off 4096 csum 3563910319 expected csum 738595262 > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131176 off 4096 csum 1344477721 expected csum 441864825 > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131241 off 245760 csum 3576232181 expected csum 2566472073 > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131429 off 0 csum 1494450239 expected csum 2646577722 > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131471 off 0 csum 3949539320 expected csum 3828807800 > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131471 off 4096 csum 3475108475 expected csum 2566472073 > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131471 off 958464 csum 142982740 expected csum 2566472073 > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131471 off 0 csum 3949539320 expected csum 3828807800 > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131532 off 270336 csum 3138898528 expected csum 2566472073 > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131532 off 1249280 csum 2169165042 expected csum 2566472073 > > BTRFS warning (device sda3): csum failed ino 131649 off 16384 csum 2914965650 expected csum 1425742005 > > > > > > A curious thing: the expected csum 2566472073 turns up a number of times for different inodes, and gets > > differing actual csums each time. I suppose this could be something like a block of all zeros in multiple files, > > but it struck me as surprising. > > > > btrfs people: is there an easy way to map those inodes to a filename ? I'm betting those are the > > test files that trinity generates. If so, it might point to a race somewhere. > > btrfs inspect inode 130654 mntpoint Interesting, they all return ERROR: ino paths ioctl: No such file or directory So these files got deleted perhaps ?
Yeah, they must have. -chris