Hi André,

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:57:04AM +0100, André Przywara wrote:
> > +           pio: pinctrl@1c20800 {
> > +                   compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-pinctrl";
> > +                   reg = <0x01c20800 0x400>;
> > +                   interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                                <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                                <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +                   clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_PIO>;
> > +                   gpio-controller;
> > +                   #gpio-cells = <3>;
> > +                   interrupt-controller;
> > +                   #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> > +
> > +                   i2c1_pins: i2c1_pins {
> > +                           allwinner,pins = "PH2", "PH3";
> > +                           allwinner,function = "i2c1";
> 
> So as Icenowy pointed out, we are missing the drive and pull properties
> here, at least as long as we don't have your patch (series) in place to
> cope with that.

Yeah sorry, we noticed first with Chen-Yu that the binding should not
need it, and then we realised that the driver was making the
assumption that they were... Sorry :/

> But if we rely on this series (which seems OK to me), shouldn't we then
> use the generic properties for pins and function here as well?

Definitely. I'll update this.

Thanks!
Maxime 

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to