On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Rusty Russell wrote: > >> Hm, quick question, which tree would this patch go to? Though the > >> cleanup is for modules, there is an indirect cross-tree dependency > >> (taint_flag.module needs to be true for TAINT_LIVEPATCH for Josh's > >> patch to still work as intended). The least complicated thing to do > >> would be to just take this through the livepatch tree (with Rusty's > >> approval :-)), no? > > > > I don't want to be sneaking this behind Rusty's back, but he hasn't > > reposnded so far. > > I finally side-stepped this by appointing Jessica maintainer, thus her > Reviewed-by is sufficient for the module tree.
Awesome! :) > Lazy, huh? Laziness has always been the main power behind all the progress of the mankind :P Jessica, do you want me to take the patch through livepatching tree still, or would you route it yourself now? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
