Hi Arnd,
On 2016/10/18 6:05, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc is unsure about the use of last_ofs_in_node, which might happen
> without a prior initialization:
>
> fs/f2fs//git/arm-soc/fs/f2fs/data.c: In function ‘f2fs_map_blocks’:
> fs/f2fs/data.c:799:54: warning: ‘last_ofs_in_node’ may be used uninitialized
> in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> if (prealloc && dn.ofs_in_node != last_ofs_in_node + 1) {
In each round of dnode block traverse, we will init 'prealloc' and then update
'prealloc' and 'last_ofs_in_node' together in below lines of f2fs_map_blocks:
if (flag == F2FS_GET_BLOCK_PRE_AIO) {
if (blkaddr == NULL_ADDR) {
prealloc++;
last_ofs_in_node = dn.ofs_in_node;
}
}
Then in below codes, it is safe to use 'last_ofs_in_node' since we will check
'prealloc' firstly, so if 'prealloc' is non-zero, 'last_ofs_in_node' must be
valid.
if (prealloc && dn.ofs_in_node != last_ofs_in_node + 1) {
So I think we should not add WARN_ON there.
Thanks,
>
> I'm not sure about it either, so to shut up the warning I initialize
> it to a known invalid -1u and later check for this, so we get a
> runtime warning if we ever hit the uninitialized case.
>
> It would be much better to reorganize the code in some form that
> made it obvious to both the compiler and the reader that this
> variable use it ok.
>
> Since I only see the warning with gcc-4.9 but not any later version,
> it's possible that the compiler is actually smarter than I am here
> and has learned to see the code as correct, in which case this
> patch could just be disregarded. It would certainly be helpful
> to get an opinion from the maintainers on the matter.
>
> Fixes: 46008c6d4232 ("f2fs: support in batch multi blocks preallocation")
> Cc: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 9ae194f..1b17de2 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -696,6 +696,12 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct
> f2fs_map_blocks *map,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * FIXME: without this, we get "warning: ‘last_ofs_in_node’ may be
> + * used uninitialized". It's not clear whether that can actually
> + * happen, so there is now a WARN_ON() checking for this.
> + */
> + last_ofs_in_node = -1u;
> next_dnode:
> if (create)
> f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> @@ -796,6 +802,7 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct
> f2fs_map_blocks *map,
> allocated = dn.node_changed;
>
> map->m_len += dn.ofs_in_node - ofs_in_node;
> + WARN_ON(last_ofs_in_node == -1u);
> if (prealloc && dn.ofs_in_node != last_ofs_in_node + 1) {
> err = -ENOSPC;
> goto sync_out;
>
