2016-10-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Sumit Semwal <[email protected]>: > On 26 October 2016 at 20:11, Benjamin Gaignard > <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2016-10-26 15:51 GMT+02:00 Sumit Semwal <[email protected]>: >>> Hello Benjamin, >>> >>> On 26 October 2016 at 19:02, Benjamin Gaignard >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> It is more or less a copy of Hisilicon driver but with a heap definition >>>> fitting with STIH4xx SoC needs. >>>> I have just chnage the some function prefix from "hi6220" to "sti". >>>> >>> Thanks for your patches! >>> >>> I was just wondering if you couldn't convert the HiSilicon driver into >>> something like a 'simple-ion' driver, and have just the DT definitions >>> as specifics? This would save a lot of code duplication, and keep it >>> as a simple interface for common heaps like cma. >> >> Create a simple-ion driver is a good idea but it means that heaps >> (configuration, name, etc..) >> will have to be describe into devicetree. I'm not sure if that will is >> acceptable. >> >>> >>> If there are any ST-specific requirements that are incompatible with >>> the existing driver, it should be clearly documented out here I think. >> >> heaps names and Ids aren't the same so I can't reuse hisilicon driver. >> > But I'd suspect both these are solvable with using something like > 'generic,cma' instead of 'hisi,cma' or 'st,cma'?
yes, but it requires to describe the heaps in devicetree. Hisilicon driver was doing like that until last month but Laura convert it to common platform: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/staging/android/ion/hisilicon?id=b6e336dbeda85585c3ba6d935753d8240e18baf1 I bet she got good reasons do to that so I have implemented sti ION driver in this mindset. >> > Best, > Sumit. -- Benjamin Gaignard Graphic Study Group Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
