On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> 
> Epoll is doing multiple passes over the ready set at the moment, because 
> of the constraints over the f_op->poll() call. Looking at the code again, 
> I noticed that we already hold the epoll semaphore in read, and this 
> (together with other locking conditions that hold while doing an 
> epoll_wait()) can lead to a smarter way to "ship" events to userspace (in 
> a single pass).

Ok, this looks fine, but I think it makes more sense with (a) a sign-off 
line and perhaps a slightly expanded explanation, and (b) keeping it in 
-mm until after 2.6.21 is out, and merging it then.

Yes? No? Linus is on some crazy drugs again?

                Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to