On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > Epoll is doing multiple passes over the ready set at the moment, because > of the constraints over the f_op->poll() call. Looking at the code again, > I noticed that we already hold the epoll semaphore in read, and this > (together with other locking conditions that hold while doing an > epoll_wait()) can lead to a smarter way to "ship" events to userspace (in > a single pass).
Ok, this looks fine, but I think it makes more sense with (a) a sign-off line and perhaps a slightly expanded explanation, and (b) keeping it in -mm until after 2.6.21 is out, and merging it then. Yes? No? Linus is on some crazy drugs again? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/