On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:07:21PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> cpuid_count_edx would be just
>
> static inline unsigned int cpuid_count_edx(unsigned op, unsigned count)
> {
> unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>
> cpuid_count(op, count, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>
> return edx;
> }
Even better.
But shouldn't this be hiding unimplemented CPUID bits from the guest?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
