4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marcinis...@intel.com>
commit eefa1d8961584c5b76afded94960ca4344bc638b upstream.
The __must_hold() is sufficent to correct the sparse
context imbalance inside a function.
Per Documentation/sparse.txt:
__must_hold - The specified lock is held on function entry and exit.
Fixes: Commit c0a67f6ba356 ("IB/rdmavt: Annotate rvt_reset_qp()")
Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessan...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marcinis...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessan...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c
@@ -501,12 +501,9 @@ static void rvt_remove_qp(struct rvt_dev
*/
static void rvt_reset_qp(struct rvt_dev_info *rdi, struct rvt_qp *qp,
enum ib_qp_type type)
- __releases(&qp->s_lock)
- __releases(&qp->s_hlock)
- __releases(&qp->r_lock)
- __acquires(&qp->r_lock)
- __acquires(&qp->s_hlock)
- __acquires(&qp->s_lock)
+ __must_hold(&qp->r_lock)
+ __must_hold(&qp->s_hlock)
+ __must_hold(&qp->s_lock)
{
if (qp->state != IB_QPS_RESET) {
qp->state = IB_QPS_RESET;
