(Third, rebased submission, since first two submissions yielded no replies.)

Previously, the hidepid parameter was checked by comparing literal
integers 0, 1, 2. Let's add a proper enum for this, to make the checking
more expressive:

        0 → HIDEPID_OFF
        1 → HIDEPID_NO_ACCESS
        2 → HIDEPID_INVISIBLE

This changes the internal labelling only, the userspace-facing interface
remains unmodified, and still works with literal integers 0, 1, 2.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Lafcadio Wluiki <wlui...@gmail.com>
---
 fs/proc/base.c                | 8 ++++----
 fs/proc/inode.c               | 2 +-
 fs/proc/root.c                | 3 ++-
 include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 6 ++++++
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index ca651ac..ae5e13c 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -726,11 +726,11 @@ static int proc_pid_permission(struct inode *inode, int 
mask)
        task = get_proc_task(inode);
        if (!task)
                return -ESRCH;
-       has_perms = has_pid_permissions(pid, task, 1);
+       has_perms = has_pid_permissions(pid, task, HIDEPID_NO_ACCESS);
        put_task_struct(task);
 
        if (!has_perms) {
-               if (pid->hide_pid == 2) {
+               if (pid->hide_pid == HIDEPID_INVISIBLE) {
                        /*
                         * Let's make getdents(), stat(), and open()
                         * consistent with each other.  If a process
@@ -1720,7 +1720,7 @@ int pid_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry 
*dentry, struct kstat *stat)
        stat->gid = GLOBAL_ROOT_GID;
        task = pid_task(proc_pid(inode), PIDTYPE_PID);
        if (task) {
-               if (!has_pid_permissions(pid, task, 2)) {
+               if (!has_pid_permissions(pid, task, HIDEPID_INVISIBLE)) {
                        rcu_read_unlock();
                        /*
                         * This doesn't prevent learning whether PID exists,
@@ -3181,7 +3181,7 @@ int proc_pid_readdir(struct file *file, struct 
dir_context *ctx)
             iter.tgid += 1, iter = next_tgid(ns, iter)) {
                char name[PROC_NUMBUF];
                int len;
-               if (!has_pid_permissions(ns, iter.task, 2))
+               if (!has_pid_permissions(ns, iter.task, HIDEPID_INVISIBLE))
                        continue;
 
                len = snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%d", iter.tgid);
diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
index e69ebe6..872325e 100644
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static int proc_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct 
dentry *root)
 
        if (!gid_eq(pid->pid_gid, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID))
                seq_printf(seq, ",gid=%u", from_kgid_munged(&init_user_ns, 
pid->pid_gid));
-       if (pid->hide_pid != 0)
+       if (pid->hide_pid != HIDEPID_OFF)
                seq_printf(seq, ",hidepid=%u", pid->hide_pid);
 
        return 0;
diff --git a/fs/proc/root.c b/fs/proc/root.c
index 8d3e484..2989731 100644
--- a/fs/proc/root.c
+++ b/fs/proc/root.c
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ int proc_parse_options(char *options, struct pid_namespace 
*pid)
                case Opt_hidepid:
                        if (match_int(&args[0], &option))
                                return 0;
-                       if (option < 0 || option > 2) {
+                       if (option < HIDEPID_OFF ||
+                           option > HIDEPID_INVISIBLE) {
                                pr_err("proc: hidepid value must be between 0 
and 2.\n");
                                return 0;
                        }
diff --git a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
index 34cce96..c2a989d 100644
--- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
+++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ struct pidmap {
 
 struct fs_pin;
 
+enum { /* definitions for pid_namespace's hide_pid field */
+       HIDEPID_OFF       = 0,
+       HIDEPID_NO_ACCESS = 1,
+       HIDEPID_INVISIBLE = 2,
+};
+
 struct pid_namespace {
        struct kref kref;
        struct pidmap pidmap[PIDMAP_ENTRIES];
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to