Re: Missing ACKs with Linux 2.2/2.4?

[Bernd Eckenfels]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The cobalt machines have now had a kernel upgrade (only to 2.2.14, thats
> the most recent that Cobalt provide...), and the problem has
> disappeared.

Should we ignore "timestamp 0" if there are systems out there which will
break on that. Or is timestamp 0 a legal value?

Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/