Hi Wan,
This patch was acked by you long before,
but it has not been pulled-in yet for some reasons.
Now the patch was split per platform.
So, could you apply this patch to your tree, please?
2016-09-19 2:59 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>:
> In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
> pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
>
> Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
> clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
> Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos....@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Split into per-arch patches
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Return only when clk is NULL. Do not take care of error pointer.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Rebase on Linux 4.6-rc1
>
> arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c
> index 2c371ff..ac6fd1a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + if (!clk)
> + return;
> +
> WARN_ON(clk->enabled == 0);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&clocks_lock, flags);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
