On Feb 27 2007 22:39, Ian Molton wrote: > Russell King wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:36:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:18:40 -0800 Stephen Hemminger >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > Then we should pull the existing udivdi3 implementations? >> > > >> > Not much point really. Some architectures have gone >> > and done that, but x86 has not. x86 has enough >> > coverage for us to pick up most problems, and any >> > remaining problems are obviously in scruffy >> > architectures which don't care about performance ;) >> >> I doubt arm26 uses udivdi3, but that's something Ian >> would have to confirm. > > I doubt it is used also, however I am not in a position > to test this until at least after I have moved house. > Please leave alone for now.
Simple. The non-arch specific code does not use 64/64 divides through the "/" operator (otherwise there would already have been udivdi3 linking errors). So what remains to check is arch/arm26. grep -Pr 'int64|\bu64' returns only a few results to check (kernel/ecard.c, nwfpe/), so the answer is most likely no. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
